By pursuing this blatant assault on free speech in such an inappropriate forum, the congress drew far more attention to Steyn’s two-year-old article than it deserved or would have received.
…
From the start, the tribunal should have agreed that Steyn’s Oct. 26, 2006 piece was insulting and wrong-headed. It might even have said it’s regrettable that Maclean’s gave space to this kind of incendiary sarcasm.
The rest.
Down With Everybody 
Pingback: Steynianism 164 « Free Mark Steyn!